• Baseball Homepage
  • Baseball Equipment
  • Baseball Knowledge
  • Baseball Related
  • Baseball Store
Home Page >> Baseball Knowledge >> Baseball Rules
Since baseball had no antisteroid rules when Barry Bonds was allegedly taking them, so he wasn't cheating.

Cheating is breaking the rules since there weren't rules against steroids he couldn't have been cheating.

So instead of everyone being mad at him, shouldn't that anger be directed at Major League Baseball for not having better rules?

By not implamenting a testing or punishment policy to the 91 rule, wasn't Major League Baseball giving de facto permision for steroid use?

The ban on steroids began in 1991, so if he has used them since that year, he has broken the rules.
There was no testing allowed so there is no proof that he has taken them, other than the huge melon.

If you run a stoplight and there is no one there to see you, did you break the law, just because MLB did not test does not mean that was not against the rules of Baseball.
It may have been a lame attempt to stop Steroids, but who would have known the extent of the problem then?

By not making any attempt to test for steroids and enforce the ban MLB was giving de facto permision for their players to use steroids. Report It

Yes, MLB was definitely dragging their feet (along with the players' union, of course) when it came to the banning of certain enhancers and the instituting of drug tests.

One can argue about Bonds violating the "spirit" of the game, but you are definitely correct in that he didn't violate a rule that was already in the books. That's one reason why I get so annoyed when people compare him to Pete Rose, a guy who violated a very clear and well-known rule.

MLB may not have had a rule against it back then but it was still illegal to use steroids. Doesn't that supersede the rules of the MLB?

That's like saying using an illegal bat is not against the rules. The rule was there and the players due to their own union were on the honor system. They don't go xraying every bat but if you get caught (See Sammy Sosa) its still cheating. No there was no testing but the players new it was illegal.

You're intelligent and smart because you are telling the truth and not spewing lies like the Barry haters! Congratulations to you for being smart and congratulations to Barry!

you are correct

Nope.

Bonds is still one of the best hitters of all time whether he used steroids or not.

Since it is illegal in the United States of America to use steroids, it is against the rules in baseball to do such a thing. Baseball rules don't say anything about murder either, but you cant kill another player - it is against the law.

Topic Related
  • Should the rules of the Hall be relaxed or should they be strengthened?
  • In Little League sanction rules, how much time has to be left in regulation time in order to start a new ining
  • Little league rules?
  • Joba Rules?
  • What rules changes would you make if you were commissioner?
  • Since baseball had no antisteroid rules when Barry Bonds was allegedly taking them, so he wasn't cheating.
  • Old time baseball rules?
  • About Us|Conditions of Use|Privacy Notice|Add Favorite|Contact Webmaster

    ©2000-2007 Stevepinto.com All rights reserved.