| Compare and Contrast ... Barry Bonds vs Roger Clemens? |
|
Everyone, including myself, is hating on Barry Bonds for roids ... this is justified in my opinion, because steroids tarnish the hallowed records and statistics of baseball records. |
|
I think Clemens is a roid boy too but he hasn't testified to it in front of a grand jury (yet). Clemens has always had a large head so maybe he's been using for a long time. |
|
Well let's see didn't Clemens sit out 60 games last year because he was so called pondering whether he should retire or come back as an Astro? Hmmmm the baseball steroid policy says for a third time offender the person should forfeit 60 games without pay. and miss a fourth of the season. And just when did Clemens Come back last year to pitch for the Astros? About 60 games plus a fourth of the season. Now I'm not saying that Clemens used but the argument can be made that he did based on those numbers. As for Bonds it's simple, Many baseball players have been found guilty of using steroids, and not one of them hit 756 homeruns. Bonds is the New King No doubt about it. To the guy above me...what the heck are you talking about?? Clemens used steroids because he took off the first part of the season?? That makes no sense whatsoever. If he took the time off due to a suspension everyone would know about it, there's no way MLB could cover that up. I don't think he ever used anything though, mainly because he's lost speed on his fastball as he got older which is the natural thing to do. He's gotten bigger, but that seems to me to be mostly around the midsection which happens to most men in their early 40's. I don't know who used and who didn't, but Clemens isn't a guy I'd be looking at even though more pitchers have gotten busted than power hitters. |
| Topic Related |
|
|
